Power2Motivate // Blogs

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Power2Motivate Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Spend less, retain more with better employee incentives

  
  
  
  
  
  

blog august25Companies that are restructuring or going through a merger should consider another approach to retaining valuable employees other than just throwing money at them.

According to a recent McKinsey Quarterly report “Retaining key employees in times of change”, there is a better and less costly way to keep good people – and it can put the company in a stronger position to seize opportunities as the economy picks up.

Companies should target the key players who are most critical and most at risk of leaving, and offer them a mix of financial and noncash incentives geared to their aspirations and concerns.

A European industrial company applied this approach during a recent relocation and restructuring, and found that it used only 25 percent of the budget it had spent before on a broad, cash-based employee retention scheme.

Here are three ways to keep top talent without breaking the bank:

1. Find the “hidden gems”

Look for the “hidden gems” who are critical to business success. Not just the usual high-flying sales people and senior executives, but the more average performers whose skills or social networks may be valuable to the company. These gems could be in IT, finance, or admin.

For example, the product-development manager nearing retirement age who is no longer on the company’s list of “high potentials” yet is crucial to ensuring a healthy product pipeline. Some sales support personnel who fill orders can be just as important as the star salespeople.

2. Be mindful of their mind-set

One company that was restructuring identified two different employee mind-sets:

• A family-oriented group worried about relocating and uprooting their families. They were offered incentives such as an increase in base pay, assistance in finding schools and kindergartens, spousal career counseling, language training, and alternative work arrangements so employees could work at home or commute instead of relocating.

• A more career-driven group was open to a move but were concerned about furthering their careers. Managers offered them a cash bonus but focused primarily on their new responsibilities in the reorganized unit, number of direct reports and leadership opportunities.

This targeted approach stabilized the new unit at one-quarter of the cost and, one year later, some 80 percent of the staff who received personalized incentives had started to work in the new location.

3. Employee recognition can be better than money

One financial services firm that was cutting costs used only nonfinancial measures—including leadership-development programs—to retain the pivotal players at risk of leaving. One year later, none of those players had quit.

Praise from a manager, recognition from leaders, promotions, opportunities to lead projects, and chances to join fast-track management programs are often more effective than cash.

As companies reinvent themselves for long-term business success, they should also reinvent their approach to determining who is really key to their organization. Offering hidden-gem employees at risk of leaving a tailored mix of financial and nonfinancial incentives can be more effective and will probably save the company money.

Written by Leslee Vivian
Leslee Vivian is a professional writer specializing in employee recognition. She blogs for Power2Motivate®, the On-Demand service that helps companies recognize, motivate, train and reward their employees.

Comments

Great tips. This post illustrates that there's more than one way to skin a cat in regards to retention. Finding out what will be most attractive and motivational to your employees is the best first step. Like how you concluded, sometimes simple recognition makes all the difference in the world.
Posted @ Thursday, August 26, 2010 12:00 PM by Drew Hawkins
Thanks for your comments Drew. I particularly like the notion of searching out the "hidden gems" in a company - the employees that make important contributions who may be overlooked when management focuses on the high performers. Recognition can go a long way towards motivating them. 
Leslee Vivian
Posted @ Friday, September 03, 2010 10:33 AM by Leslee Vivian
Businesses and public universities are into a phase of creative disassembly where reinvention and adjustments are constant. Even solid world class institutions like the University of California Berkeley under the leadership of Chancellor Birgeneau & Provost Breslauer are firing employees, staff, faculty and part-time lecturers through “Operational Excellence (OE) initiative”: last year 600 were fired, this year 300. Yet many employees, professionals and faculty cling to old assumptions about one of the most critical relationship of all: the implied, unwritten contract between employer and employee. 
 
Until recently, loyalty was the cornerstone of that relationship. Employers promised work security and a steady progress up the hierarchy in return for employees fitting in, accepting lower wages, performing in prescribed ways and sticking around. Longevity was a sign of employer-employee relations; turnover was a sign of dysfunction. None of these assumptions apply today. Organizations can no longer guarantee employment and lifetime careers, even if they want to. UC Berkeley senior management paralyzed themselves with an attachment to “success brings success’ rather than “success brings failure’ and are now forced to break the implied contract with Cal employees – a contract nurtured by management that the future can be controlled. 
 
Jettisoned Cal employees are finding that the hard won knowledge, skills and capabilities earned while being loyal are no longer valuable in the employment market place. 
 
What kind of a contract can employers and employees make with each other? The central idea is both simple and powerful: the job or position is a shared situation. Employers and employees face market and financial conditions together, and the longevity of the partnership depends on how well the for-profit or not-for-profit continues to meet the needs of customers and constituencies. Neither employer nor employee has a future obligation to the other. Organizations train people. Employees develop the kind of security they really need – skills, knowledge and capabilities that enhance future employability. 
 
The partnership can be dissolved without either party considering the other a traitor. 
 
Let there be light! 
 
Posted @ Friday, September 03, 2010 11:45 AM by MIlan Moravec
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Latest Posts